On May, 12, 2011, I went to Becky Simpson’s and Susan Hampton’s reviews. They were reviewed by Beth Balliro, John Crowe, Steve Locke and yourself. I know John Crowe and yourself but I did not know Beth and Steve so I am glad that they were at the reviews so I could get to know them better and see what they expect for artwork.
Becky’s review was first. I took notes for her; I ended up taking four pages of notes, which I’m sure she greatly appreciates. The piece Becky had reviewed was her final piece. This was a landscape seen made with various materials that included glass with etchings of dragons. Becky had this displayed with black lights to emphasis the dragons. The reviewers said that the black lights did not help. Ultimately they said the piece did not work because it was too cluttered and confusing with the various materials. But to my surprise they weren’t only reviewing her piece they were reviewing her life and artistic choices; what pressure!
When Becky told the reviewers that she asked people with more expertise with the materials for help, Steve Locke seemed to attack her a little. He asked her why she cared about what other’s think and that she shouldn’t and that no one can tell her how to do her artwork. She just needs to find what she loves and do it and not worry about what anyone else thinks.
I had mixed feelings about this advice; I thought it was kind of hypocritical coming from a person that is there to give their opinions on someone’s work. If we are “not supposed to care what people think” at art school then why do we even have reviews where people tell us how our piece “works” or “doesn’t work” and how to improve it? Also making the arts as a career is all about other people’s opinion, because if no one likes your work, you will never get money. So I am very confused as to why this advice is given, not just by Steve Locke, but by all the MassArt community. Yes one should do what they love but if I really didn’t care what people thought about my artwork I would never try to make anything I did “meaningful”, I would just create whatever I wanted. But at MassArt everything must be so “deep”. I just feel that ideologies at MassArt conflict sometimes.
This review made me nervous for my own future reviews, because Becky had such good answers to all of these questions that I wouldn’t even begin to know how to start answering! But this was a good experience for me because I can start thinking of my answers to all of these questions;
“How is this subject/piece important to you?”
“What do you most want to do with art making?”
“Do you care what other’s think?” I already know the answer to this one; “Oh no I do not care what people think or my end product, I just love the process” If I say this at a review then everyone will be happy, because that is the answer MassArt wants.
Next I attended Susan’s review. She had all of her Myan inspired work displayed for her review. Susan’s review surprised me. Since she has such a strong and clear idea of what she loves and wants to do with her work, I thought her review was going to go more smoothly than Becky’s. However the panelists were still not satisfied!
They said that Susan’s work was basically just copying a practice that was done a while ago and that even though she related it to her life it wasn’t really “her own”. For this they suggested trying to make her work more “modern” like instead of using Myan symbols, use “modern” symbols. “Three dashes equals Addias” is a example that John gave. Also instead of focusing on doing everything “right” she should focus more on feelings than technique, because she obviously has got that down pat. For example, Steve Locke suggested that she should focus on that feeling of “coming home” that she had in Guatemala.
It was funny how I went to too opposite people’s reviews. Becky seeks advice on her work and she is not sure sometimes of what to do which contrasts with Susan, who is set in her ways and knows exactly what she wants. So it was interesting to hear what the reviewers had to say to both of them. But even though these students are different, I feel that the reviewers gave them very good advice on their art making and on their lives.
Overall, attending both of these reviews was a great experience for me because I got to know some teachers better and it gave me insight as to what reviewers will be looking for from future my work.
Basically to make great art, all I have to do is listen to my heart and share visually to others what is inside it; like I did for my final painting. I guess that is why I got a really good review for it, because I was really passionate about it and sure of the message I was trying to get across. So I just have to keep doing this process for future works!








































